Morrison has a Kiwi mum EN1145

We wish you a merry Christmas.

Signatures close Christmas day.

Terms:

• Reason: Mr Morrison's mother Marion was born in Australia to a New Zealand citizen. The British Nationality and New Zealand Citizenship Act section 16 says children born of fathers born in New Zealand are citizens of that country. The law specifies male children are citizens by descent, female children were not mentioned meaning they are citizens other than by descent and able to pass New Zealand citizenship to their children. This Makes Mr Morrison a New Zealand citizen by descent. The house can't determine if Mr Morrison has or hasn't breached the constitution, that is up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Morrison to the High Court to determine if he is a New Zealand citizen and in breach of our constitution.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.
Signatures open: 27/11/2019
Signatures close: 25/12/2019

Petition number:	EN1145 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	26/10/2019

Where to sign

And if you want to buy me a cup of coffee or a beer for Christmas, 
Paypal me


Enjoy


The story that started it - goodonya Margaret Simons and the Guardian  https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/oct/26/questions-raised-scott-morrison-declaration-new-zealand-citizen



At last, put to the Attorney General.


Terms:

• Reason: Mr Morrison's mother Marion was born in Australia to a New Zealand citizen. The British Nationality and New Zealand Citizenship Act section 16 says children born of fathers born in New Zealand are citizens of that country. The law specifies male children are citizens by descent, female children were not mentioned meaning they are citizens other than by descent and able to pass New Zealand citizenship to their children. This Makes Mr Morrison a New Zealand citizen by descent. The house can't determine if Mr Morrison has or hasn't breached the constitution, that is up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Morrison to the High Court to determine if he is a New Zealand citizen and in breach of our constitution.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 10/02/2020 and has recently been referred to the Attorney-General. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.

Petition number:	EN1145 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	26/10/2019
Number of signatures:	136

EN1119 petitionchange court of diputed returns rules

Terms:

• Reason: At present the only persons who can query the eligibility of candidates in an election are voters in that particular electorate. At the moment for me to query the eligibility of a candidate in electorate "A" I have to have voted in that electorate. This suggestion would allow anyone to query the eligibility of a candidate in another electorate if they understood that candidate to be ineligible. Having voted in that electorate should not be a pre-requisite. The same time frame should apply as per the rules and laws now.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to change the relevant laws to allow any voter anywhere in Australia to challenge the eligibility of a candidate in any electorate.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 25/11/2019 and has recently been referred to the Minister for Finance. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.

Petition number:	EN1119 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	13/10/2019
Number of signatures:	11

Anyone wanting to buy me a cup of coffee...... paypal me

Some answered petitions

Some answered petitions, sort of.

Some aren't really answered in the way I wanted them. Some from Attorney General Porter fob me off and say criminal complaints are up to the Australian Federal Police, but then the AFP refuse to look at the criminal complaints because the people are Liberal party members sort of sucks.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Terms:

• Reason: The number of deaths and severe injuries in car accidents where drivers are distracted by mobile phones and other mobile devices are increasing every year. In 2014 every Member of Parliament was given an idea from Tony Magrathea to help solve the problem and save lives and nothing was done by the MPs. No MP bothered replying to Mr Magrathea about the idea. All OECD countries were given the idea, all major mobile phone companies were given the idea and nothing was done to save lives.
• Request: The petitioners request the House investigate the use of sound detection software in mobile phones and mobile devices that will listen for the distinctive noise of a motor vehicle's engine from inside the vehicle and if detected turn off the mobile device. This will irritate passengers in the vehicle but the saving of lives and stopping the maiming of so many people is worth the inconvenience of someone having to wait until they get to their destination to use their mobile devices. If the use of sound detection software is considered viable, the petitioners ask the House to consider legislation to have that sound detection software installed and activated automatically in every mobile phone and other device in use and for sale in Australia. A simple software upgrade can install this in every mobile phone and device on any specific date.

A response from the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0161 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	13/03/2017
Number of signatures:	14

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Terms:

• Reason: Senator Xenophon is in the national media complaining about former Senators Day and Culleton having to repay their senate salaries, expenses and allowances. Both former senators signed false declarations for the AEC saying they comply with S44 of the constitution. The current Centrelink robodebt campaign to recover monies wrongly paid to welfare recipients means the government must be serious in chasing these constitution breachers for every cent the wrongly received or the robodebt campaign looks like a farce.
• Request: We the petitioners ask the House to ensure that any person found to have breached the Australian constitution must repay all monies received as salary, travel expenses, accommodation and food allowances, office allowances and expenses. We also would ask that pensions be cancelled and the police asked to investigate charges of fraud for signing false declarations to nominate for election.

A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0229 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	21/05/2017
Number of signatures:	22

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Terms:

• Reason: In Parliament 44 Dr. Jensen the Chair of the Petitions Committee and Senator Cormann the Special Minister of State hid a petition asking for an audit of compliance of S44 of the constitution. They marked petition #1134-1604 not to be referred. It is still on the Petitions page for Parliament 44 marked as such in the list of petitions for Senator Cormann. In two other petitions about S44 of the constitution Senator Cormann replied by saying we should trust candidates to tell the truth when they nominate for election to parliament. Senators Day and Culleton show trust and truth doesn't work. Senator Cormanns other advice was to rely on a voter in an electorate to have enough money to begin High Court action in the Court of Disputed Returns should an MP be in breach of the constitution. This excludes a huge proportion of the voting populace from the judicial system just by address, let alone financial ability to run a High Court case. In Parliament 45 Mr Vasta the Chair of the Petitions Committee hid petition EN0038 after it was presented to parliament and read into Hansard, it was not to be referred. Action by Queensland Senators and Mr Wallace MP got the petition referred to the SMOS.
• Request: The petitioners ask that an audit of compliance of S44 of the Australian Constitution be conducted as soon as practicable and thought given to conducting such a compliance audit after every election.

A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0230 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	21/05/2017
Number of signatures:	7

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Terms:

• Reason: In 2016 Mr Joyce signed a nomination for election form indicating he complied with our constitution. In 2017 the High Court of Australia determined Mr Joyce was in fact a dual citizen of Australia and New Zealand.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Joyce to the Australian Federal Police and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions to determine if Mr Joyce signed a false declarations to nominate for election and in doing so committed a criminal act on 6 occasions. Mr Joyce is a university educated man with high intelligence and he knew his father was a New Zealand citizen. When signing 6 of his nomination for election forms he must have noticed the part about our constitution and compliance with specifically S44. As a highly educated man he would have checked to determine he complied with our constitution most especially when he was aware of Free vs Kelly and Sue vs Hill during his time as a businessman.

A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0956 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	24/06/2019
Number of signatures:	2

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Terms:

• Reason: In response to petition EN0615 The Attorney General Mr Porter said "The initiation and conduct of a prosecution is a matter for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions" this was in relation to a question about who was responsible for the initiation and conduct of a prosecution for a candidate signing a false declaration to nominate for election. The CDPP say that is not the truth. They can not initiate nor conduct a prosecution. EN0615 was a specific question about candidates signing false declarations to nominate for election. The AEC say they can not initiation prosecution or investigate candidates signing false declarations, the AFP say it is up to the AEC to initiation prosecutions and investigate matters and the Attorney General says it is up to the CDPP. Now the CDPP say they can not follow the Attorney Generals directive to initiate and conduct a prosecution of a candidate who signed a false declaration to nominate for election.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to determine if the Attorney General is correct in saying the CDPP must initiate prosecutions and investigate matters relating to candidates signing false declarations to nominate for election. If the Attorney General is incorrect then who is responsible for initiating prosecutions and investigating matters relating to candidates signing false declarations to nominate for election. We also ask that once the matter is decided the relevant authority is advised it is responsible in these matters.

A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0969 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	5/07/2019
Number of signatures:	5

If you want to buy me a coffee, please paypal.me/TonyMagrathea

EN1076 how old is the Earth

Our creationist in chief is a proclaimed believer in the Pentecostal fairy story which tells all that the Earth is just 6000 years old. This means most of our science can't exist and our Aboriginal culture is only 6000 years old instead of the 65,000 years or more it is understood to have existed.

Because our MPs from all sides refuse to answer questions I put them into petitions in parliament.  This normally means they have to be answered within 90 days.  A couple I am still waiting for answer about are the ones about mobile phones, blocking the signal while in cars and an audit of S44 compliance from parliament 44.

This petition is available for signatures until 13th of November 2019.  All you need is an email address and the ability to fill out a captcha test. A link to the signature page is here.   The touching bit of this petition is a call for the creationist in chief to tell the world how old the world is in parliament.

Petition Reason

Some members of parliament freely acknowledge they are members of branches of Christianity that believe the planet Earth is just 6000 years old. Some have declared this publicly in filmed media events. A belief such as this removes much that is science from their understanding of our world and is catastrophic for Aboriginal culture reducing it to just 6000 years for the generally accepted 65,000 years.

Petition Request

We therefore ask the House to have parliament, preferably the Prime Minister as leader of the government, to declare the Earth is probably 4.5 billion years old and Aboriginal culture is at least 65,000 years old.

Signatures are being accepted until 13 November 2019.  The link is here


Terms:

• Reason: Some members of parliament freely acknowledge they are members of branches of Christianity that believe the planet Earth is just 6000 years old. Some have declared this publicly in filmed media events. A belief such as this removes much that is science from their understanding of our world and is catastrophic for Aboriginal culture reducing it to just 6000 years for the generally accepted 65,000 years.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to have parliament, preferably the Prime Minister as leader of the government, to declare the Earth is probably 4.5 billion years old and Aboriginal culture is at least 65,000 years old.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 25/11/2019 and has recently been referred to the Prime Minister. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.

Petition number:	EN1076 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	24/09/2019
Number of signatures:	30

For those who want to buy me a coffee, thanks.  Paypal me

EN1007 Dutton indirect pecuniary interest

Dear Petitioner,

Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN1007 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	5/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: In February 2019 Mr Dutton declared he was a beneficiary of RHT family trust in his Register of Members Interests. At the same time the ABN data base lists two companies as being the responsibility of RHT family trust, CAMELIA AVENUE CHILDCARE CENTRE and BALD HILLS CHILDCARE CENTRE. The Department of Finance list both of these companies as recipients of Commonwealth funding for many years. After the election Mr Dutton declared he had renounced his family trust and was not a beneficiary. Mr Dutton's wife and children are beneficiaries of the trust and the Commonwealth money given to that trust and the two child care centres. Because his family still benefit that is an indirect pecuniary interest in that trust and a breach of S44 of our constitution. Voters in his electorate are obviously terrified of upsetting a man with so much power in this country. I was denied the chance of taking him to the Court of Disputed Returns because I don't vote in his electorate. The house can't determine if Mr Dutton has or hasn't breached the constitution, that is up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Dutton to the High Court to ascertain if an indirect pecuniary interest such as his family benefiting from Commonwealth funding is a breach of our constitution. Until S44 is changed MPs must understand nobody is above the law.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.

Signatures open: 11/09/2019 petition can be signed here

Signatures close: 9/10/2019


Should you feel inclined or care, Paypal me

Well this is fucked.

Signatures closed and the petition wasn't referred to a minister for action.

This is the response I got from the Petition Committee explaining why.










 


Petition EN0963 is here and EN0955 here.

EN0963 is a petition relating to Mr Dutton signing a false declaration to nominate for election in 2016. Also EN0955 is mentioned, that was a petition lodged before Mr Dutton decided to renounce his family trust and which can not be answered by a minister because it doesn't include the updated family trust information provided by Mr Dutton on 27/6/19.












It seems an ex Queensland copper, Llew O'Brien the Chair of the Petitions Committee may be working to protect another ex Queensland copper, Dutton, from the courts. Why else would a petition about an ex Queensland copper be hidden from parliament?

A pity we must just hope posterity find it and call it out fro what it is.  


 



 
 

How old is the Earth EN0998 rejected

Dear Petitioner,

Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0998 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	1/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: Our Prime Minster and some other members of the government have gone well beyond the political norm of the past 118 years and showed their belief in a religious sect which believes the Earth is just 6000 years old. The leader of our country needs to be a modern intelligent person who understands the age and depth of feeling of our Aboriginal culture. The leader of our country needs to be one who understands science. The leader of our country needs to be one who believes the Earth is 4.5 billion years old or more. The country can't be run by someone who is at odds with our culture, our science and our history.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to have the Prime Minister declare the planet Earth is at least 4.5 billion years old, that Aboriginal culture is at least 60,000 years old and that his sect has no place in the governance of our country.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting. Unfortunately it is unable to be accepted as a petition as it does not meet the petition requirements as listed below:

• Out of Order Reason: The language used in the petition is not moderate;

Your petition has therefore been rejected and signatures will not be able to be collected. You are welcome to make changes to your petition terms to ensure they meet the petition requirements and submit it again.


Seems parliament is protecting our creationist from the truth.  Have a read and see if you can come up with a nicer way to get the creationist to admit the Earth is 4.5 billion years old.  Also gives a huge middle finger to Aboriginal culture.


If you are so inclined, Paypal me


I tried again, will wait and see if they accept this - EN1049

 

EN1024 Parliament to sit more during the year

Dear Petitioner,


Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN1024 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	16/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: Parliament is empty more than 300 days a year. To the average voter it looks like MPs are doing very little and are in fact work shy. Parliament in Canada sits 140-160 days a year leaving more than 200 days a year for MPs to have their holidays and plenty time in their electorate.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to match the Canadian parliament and sit for 140-160 days a year.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.


Signatures open: 11/09/2019  and can be made here

Signatures close: 9/10/2019


If you are so inclined -

Paypal me