EN1216 Are creationist a danger to our country

Terms:

• Reason: Several branches of Christianity believe God created the Earth about 6000 years ago. The people who adhere to this faith are reluctant to comprehend science that requires facts and data that is more than 6000 years old. The sciences affected are geology, geography, meteorology, physics, chemistry, biology, ecology, oceanography, human biology, mycology, astronomy, zoology etc. Are members of parliament who adhere to these branches of Christian faith putting parliament and our country in danger by refusing to consider science that relies on facts and data older than 6000 years? Nobody can stop someone believing a religion that says the earth is 6000 years old but parliament must act to protect itself and our country from religious extremism that denies science and scientific fact.

• Request: We therefore ask the House to declare those branches of Christianity that believe God created the Earth 6000 years ago are a danger to parliament and our country. 

 Signatures haven't opened yet, because it is up to Llew O'Brien to declare the petition is OK to present to parliament.  The distinct fear of work from our Members of Parliament means this wont happen until February.

 A request from me for a Paypal cup of coffee or a cold beer.    Paypal me

EN1199 refer Mr Dutton to High Court and Criminal court

Terms:

• Reason: In February 2019 Mr Dutton declared he was a beneficiary of RHT family trust in his Register of Members Interests. At the same time the ABN data base lists two companies as being the responsibility of RHT family trust, CAMELIA AVENUE CHILDCARE CENTRE and BALD HILLS CHILDCARE CENTRE. The Department of Finance list both of these companies as recipients of Commonwealth funding for many years. After the election Mr Dutton declared he had renounced his family trust and was not a beneficiary. Mr Dutton's wife and children are beneficiaries of the trust and the Commonwealth money given to that trust and the two child care centres. Because his family still benefit that is an indirect pecuniary interest in that trust and a breach of S44 of our constitution. The house can not determine if an MP has or hasn't breached the constitution, that can only be determined by the High Court. Recently the Crown Solicitor said of Mr Dutton "I consider there to be some risk ... that the High Court might conclude that there is a conflict between Mr Dutton's duty as a parliamentarian and his personal interests" The Crown Solicitor noted they are not given much factual information by the MP. The High Court can and does demand much more information and can and does provide a binding judicial decision. Mr Porter refused s44 petitions based on that Crown Solicitor's advice.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Dutton to the High Court and AFP for determination.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.
Signatures open: 4/12/2019
Signatures close: 1/01/2020


Signatures can be made here

Should you liek to send some Christmas cheer or just a bottle of beer, please Paypal me

EN1198 re-examine S44 cases

Terms:

• Reason: Voters can only use the Court of Disputed returns to examine the eligibility of MPs in the electorate the voter voted in. To examine an MP's eligibility out of the voters electorate a petition to parliament is the only option. That option has been sullied recently. The Attorney General Mr Porter has refused several recent petitions mentioning S44 because of the Crown Solicitor's advice, even when that advice says the High Court might conclude that there is or may be a conflict. The house can not determine if an MP has or hasn't breached the constitution, that can only be determined by the High Court. The Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on many occasions, most famously with the then Deputy Prime Minister Mr Joyce. Recently the Crown Solicitor said of Mr Dutton "I consider there to be some risk ... that the High Court might conclude that there is a conflict between Mr Dutton's duty as a parliamentarian and his personal interests" The Crown Solicitor noted they are not given much factual information by the MP who obviously wants to ensure they stay in Parliament unhindered. The High Court can and does demand much more information and can and does provide a binding judicial decision.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to re-examine all petitions relating to breaches of S44 and put those cases to the High Court for determination.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.
Signatures open: 4/12/2019
Signatures close: 1/01/2020



Signatures here -


If you would like to buy me a cup of coffee or a beer, please Paypal me 


Terms:

• Reason: Voters can only as the Court of Disputed returns to examine the eligibility of MPs in the electorate the voter voted in. To examine an MP's eligibility out of the voters electorate a petition to parliament is the only option. That option has been sullied recently. The Attorney General Mr Porter has refused several recent petitions mentioning S44 because of the Crown Solicitor's advice, even when that advice says the High Court might conclude that there is or may be a conflict. The house can not determine if an MP has or hasn't breached the constitution, that can only be determined by the High Court. The Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on many occasions, most famously with the then Deputy Prime Minister Mr Joyce. Recently the Crown Solicitor said of Mr Dutton "I consider there to be some risk ... that the High Court might conclude that there is a conflict between Mr Dutton's duty as a parliamentarian and his personal interests" The Crown Solicitor noted they are not given much factual information by the MP who obviously wants to ensure they stay in Parliament unhindered. The High Court can and does demand much more information and can and does provide a binding judicial decision.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to re-examine all petitions relating to breaches of S44 and put those cases to the High Court for determination.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 10/02/2020 and has recently been referred to the Attorney-General. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.

Petition number:	EN1198 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	26/11/2019
Number of signatures:	7

Which MPs are creationist?

A creationist is a person who believes god created the Earth 6000 years ago. This basically means most science is a nonsense to them.  Any science that says something happened or began before 6000 years ago is totally against the belief system a creationist understands.


How many members of parliament are creationists in the Australian federal parliament?

The only way I can think of finding out is to put a petition to parliament.

Petition EN1206 was lodged today and must go through the Petitions Committee to see if it is acceptable then it is a month for signatures and 3 months to be answered.  Fingers crossed.

This is what I put in the petition:-

If you want to buy me a cup of coffee or a beer, please Paypal me

 

 

 

Morrison has a Kiwi mum EN1145

We wish you a merry Christmas.

Signatures close Christmas day.

Terms:

• Reason: Mr Morrison's mother Marion was born in Australia to a New Zealand citizen. The British Nationality and New Zealand Citizenship Act section 16 says children born of fathers born in New Zealand are citizens of that country. The law specifies male children are citizens by descent, female children were not mentioned meaning they are citizens other than by descent and able to pass New Zealand citizenship to their children. This Makes Mr Morrison a New Zealand citizen by descent. The house can't determine if Mr Morrison has or hasn't breached the constitution, that is up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Morrison to the High Court to determine if he is a New Zealand citizen and in breach of our constitution.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.
Signatures open: 27/11/2019
Signatures close: 25/12/2019

Petition number:	EN1145 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	26/10/2019

Where to sign

And if you want to buy me a cup of coffee or a beer for Christmas, 
Paypal me


Enjoy


The story that started it - goodonya Margaret Simons and the Guardian  https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/oct/26/questions-raised-scott-morrison-declaration-new-zealand-citizen



At last, put to the Attorney General.


Terms:

• Reason: Mr Morrison's mother Marion was born in Australia to a New Zealand citizen. The British Nationality and New Zealand Citizenship Act section 16 says children born of fathers born in New Zealand are citizens of that country. The law specifies male children are citizens by descent, female children were not mentioned meaning they are citizens other than by descent and able to pass New Zealand citizenship to their children. This Makes Mr Morrison a New Zealand citizen by descent. The house can't determine if Mr Morrison has or hasn't breached the constitution, that is up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Morrison to the High Court to determine if he is a New Zealand citizen and in breach of our constitution.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 10/02/2020 and has recently been referred to the Attorney-General. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.

Petition number:	EN1145 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	26/10/2019
Number of signatures:	136

EN1119 petitionchange court of diputed returns rules

Terms:

• Reason: At present the only persons who can query the eligibility of candidates in an election are voters in that particular electorate. At the moment for me to query the eligibility of a candidate in electorate "A" I have to have voted in that electorate. This suggestion would allow anyone to query the eligibility of a candidate in another electorate if they understood that candidate to be ineligible. Having voted in that electorate should not be a pre-requisite. The same time frame should apply as per the rules and laws now.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to change the relevant laws to allow any voter anywhere in Australia to challenge the eligibility of a candidate in any electorate.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 25/11/2019 and has recently been referred to the Minister for Finance. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.

Petition number:	EN1119 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	13/10/2019
Number of signatures:	11

Anyone wanting to buy me a cup of coffee...... paypal me

Some answered petitions

Some answered petitions, sort of.

Some aren't really answered in the way I wanted them. Some from Attorney General Porter fob me off and say criminal complaints are up to the Australian Federal Police, but then the AFP refuse to look at the criminal complaints because the people are Liberal party members sort of sucks.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Terms:

• Reason: The number of deaths and severe injuries in car accidents where drivers are distracted by mobile phones and other mobile devices are increasing every year. In 2014 every Member of Parliament was given an idea from Tony Magrathea to help solve the problem and save lives and nothing was done by the MPs. No MP bothered replying to Mr Magrathea about the idea. All OECD countries were given the idea, all major mobile phone companies were given the idea and nothing was done to save lives.
• Request: The petitioners request the House investigate the use of sound detection software in mobile phones and mobile devices that will listen for the distinctive noise of a motor vehicle's engine from inside the vehicle and if detected turn off the mobile device. This will irritate passengers in the vehicle but the saving of lives and stopping the maiming of so many people is worth the inconvenience of someone having to wait until they get to their destination to use their mobile devices. If the use of sound detection software is considered viable, the petitioners ask the House to consider legislation to have that sound detection software installed and activated automatically in every mobile phone and other device in use and for sale in Australia. A simple software upgrade can install this in every mobile phone and device on any specific date.

A response from the Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0161 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	13/03/2017
Number of signatures:	14

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Terms:

• Reason: Senator Xenophon is in the national media complaining about former Senators Day and Culleton having to repay their senate salaries, expenses and allowances. Both former senators signed false declarations for the AEC saying they comply with S44 of the constitution. The current Centrelink robodebt campaign to recover monies wrongly paid to welfare recipients means the government must be serious in chasing these constitution breachers for every cent the wrongly received or the robodebt campaign looks like a farce.
• Request: We the petitioners ask the House to ensure that any person found to have breached the Australian constitution must repay all monies received as salary, travel expenses, accommodation and food allowances, office allowances and expenses. We also would ask that pensions be cancelled and the police asked to investigate charges of fraud for signing false declarations to nominate for election.

A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0229 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	21/05/2017
Number of signatures:	22

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Terms:

• Reason: In Parliament 44 Dr. Jensen the Chair of the Petitions Committee and Senator Cormann the Special Minister of State hid a petition asking for an audit of compliance of S44 of the constitution. They marked petition #1134-1604 not to be referred. It is still on the Petitions page for Parliament 44 marked as such in the list of petitions for Senator Cormann. In two other petitions about S44 of the constitution Senator Cormann replied by saying we should trust candidates to tell the truth when they nominate for election to parliament. Senators Day and Culleton show trust and truth doesn't work. Senator Cormanns other advice was to rely on a voter in an electorate to have enough money to begin High Court action in the Court of Disputed Returns should an MP be in breach of the constitution. This excludes a huge proportion of the voting populace from the judicial system just by address, let alone financial ability to run a High Court case. In Parliament 45 Mr Vasta the Chair of the Petitions Committee hid petition EN0038 after it was presented to parliament and read into Hansard, it was not to be referred. Action by Queensland Senators and Mr Wallace MP got the petition referred to the SMOS.
• Request: The petitioners ask that an audit of compliance of S44 of the Australian Constitution be conducted as soon as practicable and thought given to conducting such a compliance audit after every election.

A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0230 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	21/05/2017
Number of signatures:	7

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Terms:

• Reason: In 2016 Mr Joyce signed a nomination for election form indicating he complied with our constitution. In 2017 the High Court of Australia determined Mr Joyce was in fact a dual citizen of Australia and New Zealand.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Joyce to the Australian Federal Police and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions to determine if Mr Joyce signed a false declarations to nominate for election and in doing so committed a criminal act on 6 occasions. Mr Joyce is a university educated man with high intelligence and he knew his father was a New Zealand citizen. When signing 6 of his nomination for election forms he must have noticed the part about our constitution and compliance with specifically S44. As a highly educated man he would have checked to determine he complied with our constitution most especially when he was aware of Free vs Kelly and Sue vs Hill during his time as a businessman.

A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0956 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	24/06/2019
Number of signatures:	2

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Terms:

• Reason: In response to petition EN0615 The Attorney General Mr Porter said "The initiation and conduct of a prosecution is a matter for the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions" this was in relation to a question about who was responsible for the initiation and conduct of a prosecution for a candidate signing a false declaration to nominate for election. The CDPP say that is not the truth. They can not initiate nor conduct a prosecution. EN0615 was a specific question about candidates signing false declarations to nominate for election. The AEC say they can not initiation prosecution or investigate candidates signing false declarations, the AFP say it is up to the AEC to initiation prosecutions and investigate matters and the Attorney General says it is up to the CDPP. Now the CDPP say they can not follow the Attorney Generals directive to initiate and conduct a prosecution of a candidate who signed a false declaration to nominate for election.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to determine if the Attorney General is correct in saying the CDPP must initiate prosecutions and investigate matters relating to candidates signing false declarations to nominate for election. If the Attorney General is incorrect then who is responsible for initiating prosecutions and investigating matters relating to candidates signing false declarations to nominate for election. We also ask that once the matter is decided the relevant authority is advised it is responsible in these matters.

A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0969 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	5/07/2019
Number of signatures:	5

If you want to buy me a coffee, please paypal.me/TonyMagrathea

EN1076 how old is the Earth

Our creationist in chief is a proclaimed believer in the Pentecostal fairy story which tells all that the Earth is just 6000 years old. This means most of our science can't exist and our Aboriginal culture is only 6000 years old instead of the 65,000 years or more it is understood to have existed.

Because our MPs from all sides refuse to answer questions I put them into petitions in parliament.  This normally means they have to be answered within 90 days.  A couple I am still waiting for answer about are the ones about mobile phones, blocking the signal while in cars and an audit of S44 compliance from parliament 44.

This petition is available for signatures until 13th of November 2019.  All you need is an email address and the ability to fill out a captcha test. A link to the signature page is here.   The touching bit of this petition is a call for the creationist in chief to tell the world how old the world is in parliament.

Petition Reason

Some members of parliament freely acknowledge they are members of branches of Christianity that believe the planet Earth is just 6000 years old. Some have declared this publicly in filmed media events. A belief such as this removes much that is science from their understanding of our world and is catastrophic for Aboriginal culture reducing it to just 6000 years for the generally accepted 65,000 years.

Petition Request

We therefore ask the House to have parliament, preferably the Prime Minister as leader of the government, to declare the Earth is probably 4.5 billion years old and Aboriginal culture is at least 65,000 years old.

Signatures are being accepted until 13 November 2019.  The link is here


Terms:

• Reason: Some members of parliament freely acknowledge they are members of branches of Christianity that believe the planet Earth is just 6000 years old. Some have declared this publicly in filmed media events. A belief such as this removes much that is science from their understanding of our world and is catastrophic for Aboriginal culture reducing it to just 6000 years for the generally accepted 65,000 years.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to have parliament, preferably the Prime Minister as leader of the government, to declare the Earth is probably 4.5 billion years old and Aboriginal culture is at least 65,000 years old.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 25/11/2019 and has recently been referred to the Prime Minister. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.

Petition number:	EN1076 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	24/09/2019
Number of signatures:	30

For those who want to buy me a coffee, thanks.  Paypal me

EN1007 Dutton indirect pecuniary interest

Dear Petitioner,

Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN1007 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	5/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: In February 2019 Mr Dutton declared he was a beneficiary of RHT family trust in his Register of Members Interests. At the same time the ABN data base lists two companies as being the responsibility of RHT family trust, CAMELIA AVENUE CHILDCARE CENTRE and BALD HILLS CHILDCARE CENTRE. The Department of Finance list both of these companies as recipients of Commonwealth funding for many years. After the election Mr Dutton declared he had renounced his family trust and was not a beneficiary. Mr Dutton's wife and children are beneficiaries of the trust and the Commonwealth money given to that trust and the two child care centres. Because his family still benefit that is an indirect pecuniary interest in that trust and a breach of S44 of our constitution. Voters in his electorate are obviously terrified of upsetting a man with so much power in this country. I was denied the chance of taking him to the Court of Disputed Returns because I don't vote in his electorate. The house can't determine if Mr Dutton has or hasn't breached the constitution, that is up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Dutton to the High Court to ascertain if an indirect pecuniary interest such as his family benefiting from Commonwealth funding is a breach of our constitution. Until S44 is changed MPs must understand nobody is above the law.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.

Signatures open: 11/09/2019 petition can be signed here

Signatures close: 9/10/2019


Should you feel inclined or care, Paypal me

Well this is fucked.

Signatures closed and the petition wasn't referred to a minister for action.

This is the response I got from the Petition Committee explaining why.










 


Petition EN0963 is here and EN0955 here.

EN0963 is a petition relating to Mr Dutton signing a false declaration to nominate for election in 2016. Also EN0955 is mentioned, that was a petition lodged before Mr Dutton decided to renounce his family trust and which can not be answered by a minister because it doesn't include the updated family trust information provided by Mr Dutton on 27/6/19.












It seems an ex Queensland copper, Llew O'Brien the Chair of the Petitions Committee may be working to protect another ex Queensland copper, Dutton, from the courts. Why else would a petition about an ex Queensland copper be hidden from parliament?

A pity we must just hope posterity find it and call it out fro what it is.  


 



 
 

How old is the Earth EN0998 rejected

Dear Petitioner,

Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0998 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	1/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: Our Prime Minster and some other members of the government have gone well beyond the political norm of the past 118 years and showed their belief in a religious sect which believes the Earth is just 6000 years old. The leader of our country needs to be a modern intelligent person who understands the age and depth of feeling of our Aboriginal culture. The leader of our country needs to be one who understands science. The leader of our country needs to be one who believes the Earth is 4.5 billion years old or more. The country can't be run by someone who is at odds with our culture, our science and our history.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to have the Prime Minister declare the planet Earth is at least 4.5 billion years old, that Aboriginal culture is at least 60,000 years old and that his sect has no place in the governance of our country.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting. Unfortunately it is unable to be accepted as a petition as it does not meet the petition requirements as listed below:

• Out of Order Reason: The language used in the petition is not moderate;

Your petition has therefore been rejected and signatures will not be able to be collected. You are welcome to make changes to your petition terms to ensure they meet the petition requirements and submit it again.


Seems parliament is protecting our creationist from the truth.  Have a read and see if you can come up with a nicer way to get the creationist to admit the Earth is 4.5 billion years old.  Also gives a huge middle finger to Aboriginal culture.


If you are so inclined, Paypal me


I tried again, will wait and see if they accept this - EN1049

 

EN1024 Parliament to sit more during the year

Dear Petitioner,


Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN1024 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	16/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: Parliament is empty more than 300 days a year. To the average voter it looks like MPs are doing very little and are in fact work shy. Parliament in Canada sits 140-160 days a year leaving more than 200 days a year for MPs to have their holidays and plenty time in their electorate.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to match the Canadian parliament and sit for 140-160 days a year.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.


Signatures open: 11/09/2019  and can be made here

Signatures close: 9/10/2019


If you are so inclined -

Paypal me 

EN1020 Climate crisis

Dear Petitioner,


Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN1020 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	9/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: The planet Earth is pretty much finished as a home for humans and other animals unless we act dramatically to stop our polluting the biosphere. This petition is to let our descendants know some of us cared and some of us wanted change for the better. Calling a climate crisis is the first step that must be taken to ensure we have a chance to pass on a viable world for our kids and grandkids and great grandkids to live in.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to declare a climate crisis effective immediately.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.

Signatures open: 11/09/2019 and can be signed here

Signatures close: 9/10/2019

 If you are so inclined

Paypal me




Terms:

• Reason: The planet Earth is pretty much finished as a home for humans and other animals unless we act dramatically to stop our polluting the biosphere. This petition is to let our descendants know some of us cared and some of us wanted change for the better. Calling a climate crisis is the first step that must be taken to ensure we have a chance to pass on a viable world for our kids and grandkids and great grandkids to live in.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to declare a climate crisis effective immediately.

A response from the Minister for the Environment was presented in the House on 2/12/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN1020 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	9/08/2019
Number of signatures:	23.

 

Angus Taylor totally woosed out.  What a no-hoper of an environment minister.

EN0992 taxpayer funding of schools

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0992 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	29/07/2019
Number of signatures:	92

Terms:

• Reason: Australia appears to be the only country in the world that provides taxpayer funding for private schools. With religious schools it seems Scotland gives taxpayer funding to catholic schools as a result of a 1920's laws. Muslim countries give taxpayer funding to Islamic schools. There doesn't seem to be any other country in the world that has taxpayer funding for in effect private religious schools.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to stop taxpayer funding for all private and religious schools. If a person wants a private or religious school education for their children it should be paid for at their own expense, not by what is in effect government welfare for the elite.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 9/09/2019 and has recently been referred to the Minister for Education. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.



If you are so inclined  Paypal me.

EN0991 Stop charitable status for religions

Dear Petitioner,



This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0991 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	29/07/2019
Number of signatures:	227

Terms:

• Reason: The recent Royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse has shown the religious organisations in this country are only interested in protecting themselves and making money. If they were truly a charitable organisation there would have been no need for a royal Commission into the raping and abusing and in some cases torture of children.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to cancel charitable status for all religious organisations and have them start paying taxes like any other business.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 9/09/2019 and has recently been referred to the Treasurer. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.


If you are so inclined Paypal me

Why do we bother with petitions? Supposed to be trying to get MPs to take notice of what the people want. Protecting the paedophiles again.

EN0981 Richard Boyle whistleblower

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0981 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	19/07/2019
Number of signatures:	464

Terms:

• Reason: Richard Boyle is a former ATO staff member who is currently facing 161 years in jail for blowing the whistle on the ATO for its use of heavy handed tactics and revenue targets as motivation in its collection of debts. Before going public with this information he disclosed his concerns under the Public Interest Disclosure Act to the ATO where they were investigated and dismissed. He subsequently went public with this information which resulted in a investigation by Four Corners for ABC titled "Mongrel bunch of bastards". The issues he raised have since been reviewed by Treasury and the Inspector General of Taxation and resulted in changes to laws yet he is now on trial, having been charged with 66 offences, though his actions were clearly performed for the public good.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to ask the Attorney General to intervene in this matter and end the prosecution of Richard Boyle. Prosecuting this individual will greatly discourage any other potential whistle-blowers from coming forward and further erode public faith in our institutions. 

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 9/09/2019 and has recently been referred to the Attorney-General. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.  



If you feel inclined, Paypal me


Terms:

• Reason: Richard Boyle is a former ATO staff member who is currently facing 161 years in jail for blowing the whistle on the ATO for its use of heavy handed tactics and revenue targets as motivation in its collection of debts. Before going public with this information he disclosed his concerns under the Public Interest Disclosure Act to the ATO where they were investigated and dismissed. He subsequently went public with this information which resulted in a investigation by Four Corners for ABC titled "Mongrel bunch of bastards". The issues he raised have since been reviewed by Treasury and the Inspector General of Taxation and resulted in changes to laws yet he is now on trial, having been charged with 66 offences, though his actions were clearly performed for the public good.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to ask the Attorney General to intervene in this matter and end the prosecution of Richard Boyle. Prosecuting this individual will greatly discourage any other potential whistle-blowers from coming forward and further erode public faith in our institutions.

A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the House on 10/02/2020 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0981 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	19/07/2019
Number of signatures:	464

 

EN0963 Did Dutton sign false declaration n 2016

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0963 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	28/06/2019
Number of signatures:	9

Terms:

• Reason: In February 2019 Mr Dutton declared he was a beneficiary of RHT family trust in his Register of Members Interests. At the same time the ABN data base lists two companies as being the responsibility of RHT family trust, CAMELIA AVENUE CHILDCARE CENTRE and BALD HILLS CHILDCARE CENTRE. The Department of Finance list both of these companies as recipients of Commonwealth funding for many years.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to determine if Mr Dutton was a beneficiary of RHT family trust when he signed his nomination for election form for the 2016 election. As companies run by the RHT family trust are recipients of Commonwealth funding Mr Dutton may have signed a false declaration to nominate for election. We ask that the House ask the relevant authorities, either Australian Federal Police or Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions or both to prosecute criminal charges against Mr Dutton for signing a false declaration to nominate for election. 

 If you want to, please consider :-
PAYPAL ME

Another fob off, Christian Porter must be doing a Scott Morrison - thinking we are all fucking stupid.

EN0956 Did Joyce sign a false declaration to nominate?

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0956 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	24/06/2019
Number of signatures:	2

Terms:

• Reason: In 2016 Mr Joyce signed a nomination for election form indicating he complied with our constitution. In 2017 the High Court of Australia determined Mr Joyce was in fact a dual citizen of Australia and New Zealand.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Joyce to the Australian Federal Police and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions to determine if Mr Joyce signed a false declarations to nominate for election and in doing so committed a criminal act on 6 occasions. Mr Joyce is a university educated man with high intelligence and he knew his father was a New Zealand citizen. When signing 6 of his nomination for election forms he must have noticed the part about our constitution and compliance with specifically S44. As a highly educated man he would have checked to determine he complied with our constitution most especially when he was aware of Free vs Kelly and Sue vs Hill during his time as a businessman. 

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 9/09/2019 and has recently been referred to the Attorney-General. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.


 If you want to, please consider :-
PAYPAL ME

En0955 Dutton or his family recieved Commonwealth funds?

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0955 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	24/06/2019
Number of signatures:	1

Terms:

• Reason: In the qualifications check list for nomination for election in 2019 Mr Dutton says he has no direct or indirect financial interests in any contract or other agreement with the Commonwealth public service.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to to determine if the family trust listed in Mr Duttons entry in the register of Members Interests dated 8/2/19 where he lists himself as a beneficiary of RHT family trust received Commonwealth funds. According to Department of Finance documents RHT family trust received more than $5 million dollars in Commonwealth funding since 2014. If the RHT family trust received Commonwealth funds and Mr Dutton or his family are beneficiaries of that trust we request the house refer the matter to the Australian Federal Police for prosecution of signing a false declaration to nominate for election and for Mr Dutton to be referred to the High Court for S44 adjudication.

PAYPAL ME

Total fob off by Christian Porter. He didn't bother reading the petition and used the Solicitor Generals advice, he is the bloke who got Barnaby Joyce so wrong.

Petition EN0954. Frydenberg false declaration

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0954 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	24/06/2019
Number of signatures:	2

Terms:

• Reason: In the qualifications check list for nomination to stand for election Mr Frydenberg listed his mother as ceasing being an Hungarian citizen in 1948.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to determine if the Department of Immigration document N50/2/14601 signed by C.E. Norton Inspector of Customs on 16th January 1951 is a legitimate government document and shows Mr Frydenberg's mother as being an Hungarian citizen on that date. If the document is legitimate will the house refer Mr Frydenberg to the Australian Federal Police for signing a false declaration to nominate for election. Will the house also refer Mr Frydenberg to teh High Court to examine his compliance with S44 of the constitution regarding his citizenship status.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 9/09/2019 and has recently been referred to the Attorney-General. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.


Paypal me

Strange considering Christian Porter had already passed the matter onto the Attorney Generals Department who passed it on to the Australian Federal Police for action.

Peter Dutton asked if he was criminal or immoral

Dear Mr Dutton

in a recent video posted on social media you say you have never done anything criminal or immoral and would like to be told if you have.

Criminal

Signing a false declaration to nominate for election.

In your qualifications check list for the 2019 election you did not mention that you have an indirect pecuniary interest in companies that receive millions in Commonwealth dollars. Your wife and children get Commonwealth funding for child care centres they benefit from.  You get an indirect pecuniary interest in those child care centres because your wife and children benefit. Indirect means they money doesn't have to go directly to you or companies you own, the indirect part is your family benefits greatly.

Your failure to mention this is in breach of Division 136 & 137 of the Criminal Code

I trust you will be asking Mr Colvin to examine the case and prosecute immediately.

Immoral

You failed to put yourself to the High Court in last parliament when you were listed on the family trust and got a direct pecuniary interest in companies receiving Commonwealth dollars. Many of your parliamentary colleagues put themselves to the High Court for the court to determine if they were in parliament illegally, you didn't bother.   Mr Joyce used the same solicitors you did as did quite a few other MPs and all were found in breach of our constitution. You didn't bother which stinks of your immorality.

Immoral or illegal?

Several Commonwealth Crimes Reports have been lodged with the AFP and Mr Colvin has chosen to not even examine them.  One person who lodged a CCR was told he would be ignored.

Are Mr Colvin and the AFP refusing to examine Commonwealth Crimes Reports against members of parliament to protect you and other members of your party? It isn't just the LNP Liberals and Nationals being reported.

Or are Mr Colvin and the AFP acting under your orders to ignore the Commonwealth Crimes Reports?  Will you allow those Commonwealth Crimes Reports, last parliament and this, to be actioned by the AFP?

If you really are going to become a moral MP you should stand aside until the criminal action and the High Court actions are investigated by the courts.

I dare you to become moral and legal.

regards

Tony Magrathea

PS this letter is in parliamentary archives for posterity to determine if you are moral and legal, it will also be on social media