Cats are furry little killing machines and I used to keep a cat trap to send them off to the pound. We have quite a few large pythons in the area that seem to enjoy cat as a food s ono need to run a cat trap anymore.
Pain in the bum me tried a petition to parliament to treat cats in Queensland the same way we treat rabbits - can't be kept as pets and declared an environmental problem.
That was fobbed off by the Minister for Primary Industries - Tony Perrett MP. Goodness knows why it was sent to him to answer.
Another petition was put to standardise cat laws throughout Queensland. There are currently 77 council and city local government areas each with their own rules and regulations.
Again fobbed off by Tony Perrett who decided to leave all the 77 different laws and regulations alone.
Verbal anarchist me then sent emails to all my local councillors as they are the ones in control of cat laws.
This is what I sent to them all:-
The replies:-
Joe Natoli asked me to write to Bleijie the Deputy Premier - seems Jazza couldn't give a fuck about the environment - didn't bother answering my email. Forwarded it to Perrett. Not happy.
Mind you Jazza hasn't liked me for years.
Christian Dickson done good
Sunday, November 21, 2021
This blog I am copying below has been banned from Facebook because is is dangerous.
The anti vaxxer trash have been getting their mates at Facebook to ban it.
Lets see how long this one lasts.
Red cross on the door
Long, long time ago during the plague years, a red cross was painted on the doors of those who were a danger to everyone else.
Sunshine
Coast Businesses Welcome All is a Facebook page for all of those small
business owners who intend on ignoring the Queensland Health regulations
due to start on the 17th of December 2021. https://www.facebook.com/groups/891978285033001/
The
health regulations basically say unvaccinated people cant enter places
such as cafes, restaurants, pubs, libraries, old peoples care homes
etc. The wording is in this:-
The Prime Minister of Australia Scott Morrison is a dual citizen and in parliament illegally.
S44 of the Australian constitution says
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 44
Disqualification
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 44
Disqualification
Any person who:
(i) is under any acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence
to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or
privileges of a subject or a citizen of a foreign power; or
Mr Morrison's Mother Marion Elsie (nee) Smith was born in Surrey Hills NSW on 14/1/1943 to a New Zealand father Lesley John Smith. He was born at Ashburton Canterbury NZ on 10/8/1917.
Start off with 16 1(a) - that declares Lesley John Smith to be New Zealand citizen.
16 2 says if a person was a British subject prior to the law being enacted and their father qualifies as a New Zealander under 1 (a) or (b), they become a New Zealand citizen.
16 5 says a male person who becomes a New Zealand citizen by virtue of 16.2 shall become a New Zealand citizen by descent.
Marion Elsie Smith became a New Zealand citizen in her own right thanks to 16.2 of the act and wasn't a citizen by descent because she was female and not male as specified in 16.5.
Click no because you werent born in NZ, click no for Western Samoa, next page asks if a parent was a citizen
Click yes because Marion Elsie Smith was a New Zealand citizen
The next question is what sort of citizenship did your parent have? By birth or grant.
You are a New Zealand citizen by descent
You can register your citizenship and order a passport at the same time.
Mr Morrison says he hasn't registered his citizenship but that is only official paperwork. He is a New Zealand citizen. He needs to register to get a passport.
Yes I take paypal. If you want to buy me a coffee please paypal me
The reason I wrote this was because of Margaret Simons writing a story in the Guardian. That was back in October 2019.
I wrote a petition to parliament EN1145. It was closed for signatures on Christmas Day 2019. It says:-
Mr
Morrison's mother Marion was born in Australia to a New Zealand citizen.
The British Nationality and New Zealand Citizenship Act section 16 says
children born of fathers born in New Zealand are citizens of that
country. The law specifies male children are citizens by descent, female
children were not mentioned meaning they are citizens other than by
descent and able to pass New Zealand citizenship to their children.
This Makes Mr Morrison a New Zealand citizen by descent.
The house can't determine if Mr Morrison has or hasn't breached the
constitution, that is up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth
Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
We therefore
ask the House to refer Mr Morrison to the High Court to determine if he
is a New Zealand citizen and in breach of our constitution.
Mr Porter the Attorney General replied on 3/3/20 saying basically that we the voter cant lodge petitions asking about S44 compliance and that the referral to the Court of Disputed Returns must come from the Privileges & Members Interests Committee. Mr Gorman, the Deputy Chair of that committee said in an email to me that the committee does not have the legislation to refer anyone to any court.
A further letter from the Attorney Generals Department, not Christian Porter, said:-
The important bit seems to say that parliament determines the legal status of MPs, not the High Court.
In relation to your comment regarding the role of electors bringing a challenge to the
eligibility of parliamentarians, the High Court has held that in a proceeding for a penalty
under the Common Informers (Parliamentary Disqualifications) Act 1975 it is not able to
determine whether someone is incapable of sitting as a member of the House of
Representatives or senator due to s 44 of the Constitution (Alley v Gillespie (2018)
264 CLR 328). Any question of s 44 incapability is to be determined by the House of
Representatives or Senate itself under s 47 of the Constitution, unless either house resolves
to refer the matter to the Court of Disputed Returns under the
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My local MP is Andrew Wallace, an LNP member of parliament. He used to be a
barrister before entering parliament and now seems to be a barista. I have written to my
local MP on several occasions asking him to follow House rules and put Mr Morrison
into the High Court to determine his eligibility to sit in parliament. He blocks me on all
social media and refuses to answer my emails. I have written to him, Mr Smith the Speaker
and the Queensland Bar Association to see if his determination to protect Mr Morrison
from the law is against the Bar Association rules and the Rules of the House of Parliament.
Reason: The country is suffering
great angst about coal. Is it good, is it bad, should we mine it or
should we leave it in the ground.
One of the biggest problems facing this country is the amount of
government money, aka tax dollars, flowing to the coal mining companies
in the forms of subsidies, interest free loans, grants etc.
Subsidies to the coal industry are made by the federal government and
state governments but with the likes of COAG a coordinated approach
could be made to free the coal industry to allow it to operate with no
governmental financial constraints.
Some authorities put the amount of money given to the coal industries as
being in the vicinity of twenty nine billion dollars. Stopping those
subsidies to the coal industry would allow the industry to operate in a
free market which I believe is one of the basic ideological tenets of
our government.
The money saved would be ideal for expenditure in our regions or in
financing the ABC properly.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to coordinate with the states stopping all subsidies, loans and grants
to coal companies to allow them to operate in a free market.
Feeling generous? Buy me a beer or a coffee, Paypal me.
Reason: Social Services Minister
Anne Ruston is considering bringing in drug testing for Newstart
recipients.
Newstart recipients get tax payer dollar while they look for work.
Members of parliament get tax payer dollar working for the community.
There should be no real difference between what happens to Newstart
recipients and to our elected representatives.
Most major corporations throughout the world have some form of drug
testing and alcohol testing for their highly paid staff. Generally for
the larger companies compulsory testing starts with a salary of $80,000
per annum. Our members of parliament get paid from about $200,000 per
annum.and up.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to institute drug and alcohol testing for members of parliament. Daily
while in Canberra and randomly when not in Canberra.
Feeling generous? Want to buy me a beer or a coffee? Paypal me.
Reason: The British Prime Minister
Boris Johnson has announced that Britain will ban all new internal
combustion engine vehicles by 2035.
Britain allows the sale of cheap electric vehicles made in Europe,
China, India, the USA, we dont. Our electric vehicles seem to be
limited to the elitist versions, the most expensive versions so that
those in control of the country can keep the quiet Australians from
having a quiet car that doesn't use petrol. This may be to the major
political parties getting major donations form the fossil fuel
industries.
If we ban the internal combustion engine we no longer have manufacturing
industries that would be affected. the service industries could easily
switch to electric vehicles.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to allow the sale of cheap electric vehicle from all corners of the
world and to ban the sale of internal combustion engine vehicles by
2025.
Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on
Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition
requirements. It is now available for signature online.
Signatures open: 12/02/2020
Signatures close: 11/03/2020
Way back when at the now defunct Arafura Bowls club in Darwin the New Years Eve party would have a dummy spitting competition for all of the members who spat the dummy and left the club.
We on the committee would line up with a dummy for each member to see how far the dummy could actually be spat. All good fun and a middle finger for the dummy spitters.
Parliament in Australia has done a massive dummy spit thanks to Llew O'Brien.
It required a petition so here it is. The Petition hasn't been approved by the petitions committee yet, I am unsure if Llew quit the job as chair of the committee before he became deputy Speaker in the House.
Reason: This week saw a ridiculous
situation where a Queenslander, elected to parliament as a member of the
LNP in Queensland spat the dummy and quit sitting with the Nationals in
their party room.
It makes a sham of what we do in Queensland. We either vote for the LNP
or not. It shouldn't then be up to the whim of the MP to decide if they
will be a National or a Liberal in parliament. Our dummy spitter
decided he wouldn't be either National or Liberal, surely he must go to
the Liberals if he was elected as an LNP MP or renounce his membership
of the LNP and be just an independent?
Relying on the whim of an individual to decide who they will represent
in Parliament rather than on the vote of the electorate is not
democracy. MPs are elected as LNP members and must represent the LNP in
parliament.
Request: We therefore ask the House to order the members of the LNP to be listed as a separate party within Parliament.
If you want to buy me a coffee or a beer for this and other petitions, you can
Request: We therefore ask the House
to instruct Members to begin communicating with voters by answering
emails, stop blocking social media and email accounts, answering Twitter
and Facebook questions posted by voters.
If you would like to buy me a cup of coffee or a beer, please paypal me.
The link to the parliament house petition page is here.
Our politicians go missing regularly. And we don't know where they are.
So petition EN1255 has been lodged, hopefully they will accept the petition and start listing where the work shy bludgers are at any given moment.
Terms:
Reason: A national fire emergency
has been happening since at least August 2019 and is continuing into
January 2020. Parliament has sat for just 20 days in that time. The
emergency has been labelled the Hawaiian Holiday fires because our Prime
Minster took off for a holiday and apparently no one knew where he was.
My own local MP Andrew Wallace has done the same, emails to his office
are answered with a message saying he is missing from 20/12/19 until
13/1/20.
Mr Dutton the minister responsible for Home Affairs which is responsible
for Emergency Management seems to have gone missing and we don't know
where he are.
We voters need to know where our Members of Parliament are so we can
find them to ask for help if needed or to ask for information if wanted.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to arrange for a web page to be created and updated regularly showing
where our elected representatives are. This must show their current
location live and any future projected locations.
Reason: Several branches of
Christianity believe God created the Earth about 6000 years ago. The
people who adhere to this faith are reluctant to comprehend science that
requires facts and data that is more than 6000 years old. The sciences
affected are geology, geography, meteorology, physics, chemistry,
biology, ecology, oceanography, human biology, mycology, astronomy,
zoology etc.
Are members of parliament who adhere to these branches of Christian
faith putting parliament and our country in danger by refusing to
consider science that relies on facts and data older than 6000 years?
Nobody can stop someone believing a religion that says the earth is 6000
years old but parliament must act to protect itself and our country
from religious extremism that denies science and scientific fact.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to declare those branches of Christianity that believe God created the
Earth 6000 years ago are a danger to parliament and our country.
Signatures haven't opened yet, because it is up to Llew O'Brien to declare the petition is OK to present to parliament. The distinct fear of work from our Members of Parliament means this wont happen until February.
A request from me for a Paypal cup of coffee or a cold beer. Paypal me
Reason: In February 2019 Mr Dutton
declared he was a beneficiary of RHT family trust in his Register of
Members Interests. At the same time the ABN data base lists two
companies as being the responsibility of RHT family trust, CAMELIA
AVENUE CHILDCARE CENTRE and BALD HILLS CHILDCARE CENTRE. The Department
of Finance list both of these companies as recipients of Commonwealth
funding for many years. After the election Mr Dutton declared he had
renounced his family trust and was not a beneficiary. Mr Dutton's wife
and children are beneficiaries of the trust and the Commonwealth money
given to that trust and the two child care centres. Because his family
still benefit that is an indirect pecuniary interest in that trust and a
breach of S44 of our constitution.
The house can not determine if an MP has or hasn't breached the
constitution, that can only be determined by the High Court. Recently
the Crown Solicitor said of Mr Dutton "I consider there to be some risk
... that the High Court might conclude that there is a conflict between
Mr Dutton's duty as a parliamentarian and his personal interests" The
Crown Solicitor noted they are not given much factual information by the
MP. The High Court can and does demand much more information and can
and does provide a binding judicial decision.
Mr Porter refused s44 petitions based on that Crown Solicitor's advice.
Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Dutton to the High Court and AFP for determination.
Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on
Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition
requirements. It is now available for signature online.
Signatures open: 4/12/2019
Signatures close: 1/01/2020
Reason: Voters can only use the
Court of Disputed returns to examine the eligibility of MPs in the
electorate the voter voted in. To examine an MP's eligibility out of
the voters electorate a petition to parliament is the only option. That
option has been sullied recently. The Attorney General Mr Porter has
refused several recent petitions mentioning S44 because of the Crown
Solicitor's advice, even when that advice says the High Court might
conclude that there is or may be a conflict.
The house can not determine if an MP has or hasn't breached the
constitution, that can only be determined by the High Court. The
Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on many
occasions, most famously with the then Deputy Prime Minister Mr Joyce.
Recently the Crown Solicitor said of Mr Dutton "I consider there to be
some risk ... that the High Court might conclude that there is a
conflict between Mr Dutton's duty as a parliamentarian and his personal
interests"
The Crown Solicitor noted they are not given much factual information by
the MP who obviously wants to ensure they stay in Parliament
unhindered. The High Court can and does demand much more information
and can and does provide a binding judicial decision.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to re-examine all petitions relating to breaches of S44 and put those
cases to the High Court for determination.
Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on
Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition
requirements. It is now available for signature online.
Signatures open: 4/12/2019
Signatures close: 1/01/2020
If you would like to buy me a cup of coffee or a beer, please Paypal me
Terms:
Reason: Voters can only as the
Court of Disputed returns to examine the eligibility of MPs in the
electorate the voter voted in. To examine an MP's eligibility out of
the voters electorate a petition to parliament is the only option. That
option has been sullied recently. The Attorney General Mr Porter has
refused several recent petitions mentioning S44 because of the Crown
Solicitor's advice, even when that advice says the High Court might
conclude that there is or may be a conflict.
The house can not determine if an MP has or hasn't breached the
constitution, that can only be determined by the High Court. The
Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on many
occasions, most famously with the then Deputy Prime Minister Mr Joyce.
Recently the Crown Solicitor said of Mr Dutton "I consider there to be
some risk ... that the High Court might conclude that there is a
conflict between Mr Dutton's duty as a parliamentarian and his personal
interests"
The Crown Solicitor noted they are not given much factual information by
the MP who obviously wants to ensure they stay in Parliament
unhindered. The High Court can and does demand much more information
and can and does provide a binding judicial decision.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to re-examine all petitions relating to breaches of S44 and put those
cases to the High Court for determination.
The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the
Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It
was presented to the House on 10/02/2020 and has recently been referred
to the Attorney-General.
Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from
presentation in the House to respond to a petition.
A creationist is a person who believes god created the Earth 6000 years ago. This basically means most science is a nonsense to them. Any science that says something happened or began before 6000 years ago is totally against the belief system a creationist understands.
How many members of parliament are creationists in the Australian federal parliament?
The only way I can think of finding out is to put a petition to parliament.
Petition EN1206 was lodged today and must go through the Petitions Committee to see if it is acceptable then it is a month for signatures and 3 months to be answered. Fingers crossed.
This is what I put in the petition:-
If you want to buy me a cup of coffee or a beer, please Paypal me
Reason: Mr Morrison's mother Marion
was born in Australia to a New Zealand citizen. The British Nationality
and New Zealand Citizenship Act section 16 says children born of
fathers born in New Zealand are citizens of that country. The law
specifies male children are citizens by descent, female children were
not mentioned meaning they are citizens other than by descent and able
to pass New Zealand citizenship to their children.
This Makes Mr Morrison a New Zealand citizen by descent.
The house can't determine if Mr Morrison has or hasn't breached the
constitution, that is up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth
Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to refer Mr Morrison to the High Court to determine if he is a New
Zealand citizen and in breach of our constitution.
Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on
Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition
requirements. It is now available for signature online.
Signatures open: 27/11/2019
Signatures close: 25/12/2019
Reason: Mr Morrison's mother Marion
was born in Australia to a New Zealand citizen. The British Nationality
and New Zealand Citizenship Act section 16 says children born of
fathers born in New Zealand are citizens of that country. The law
specifies male children are citizens by descent, female children were
not mentioned meaning they are citizens other than by descent and able
to pass New Zealand citizenship to their children.
This Makes Mr Morrison a New Zealand citizen by descent.
The house can't determine if Mr Morrison has or hasn't breached the
constitution, that is up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth
Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to refer Mr Morrison to the High Court to determine if he is a New
Zealand citizen and in breach of our constitution.
The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the
Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It
was presented to the House on 10/02/2020 and has recently been referred
to the Attorney-General.
Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from
presentation in the House to respond to a petition.
Reason: At present the only persons
who can query the eligibility of candidates in an election are voters
in that particular electorate.
At the moment for me to query the eligibility of a candidate in
electorate "A" I have to have voted in that electorate. This
suggestion would allow anyone to query the eligibility of a candidate in
another electorate if they understood that candidate to be ineligible.
Having voted in that electorate should not be a pre-requisite.
The same time frame should apply as per the rules and laws now.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to change the relevant laws to allow any voter anywhere in Australia to
challenge the eligibility of a candidate in any electorate.
The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the
Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It
was presented to the House on 25/11/2019 and has recently been referred
to the Minister for Finance.
Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from
presentation in the House to respond to a petition.
Petition number:
EN1119 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:
13/10/2019
Number of signatures:
11
Anyone wanting to buy me a cup of coffee...... paypal me
Some aren't really answered in the way I wanted them. Some from Attorney General Porter fob me off and say criminal complaints are up to the Australian Federal Police, but then the AFP refuse to look at the criminal complaints because the people are Liberal party members sort of sucks.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Terms:
Reason: The number of deaths and
severe injuries in car accidents where drivers are distracted by mobile
phones and other mobile devices are increasing every year.
In 2014 every Member of Parliament was given an idea from Tony Magrathea
to help solve the problem and save lives and nothing was done by the
MPs. No MP bothered replying to Mr Magrathea about the idea. All OECD
countries were given the idea, all major mobile phone companies were
given the idea and nothing was done to save lives.
Request: The petitioners request
the House investigate the use of sound detection software in mobile
phones and mobile devices that will listen for the distinctive noise of
a motor vehicle's engine from inside the vehicle and if detected turn
off the mobile device. This will irritate passengers in the vehicle but
the saving of lives and stopping the maiming of so many people is worth
the inconvenience of someone having to wait until they get to their
destination to use their mobile devices.
If the use of sound detection software is considered viable, the
petitioners ask the House to consider legislation to have that sound
detection software installed and activated automatically in every mobile
phone and other device in use and for sale in Australia. A simple
software upgrade can install this in every mobile phone and device on
any specific date.
A response from the Minister for Industry, Innovation and
Science was presented in the House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy
of the response here.
Petition number:
EN0161 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:
13/03/2017
Number of signatures:
14
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Terms:
Reason: Senator Xenophon is in the
national media complaining about former Senators Day and Culleton having
to repay their senate salaries, expenses and allowances. Both former
senators signed false declarations for the AEC saying they comply with
S44 of the constitution.
The current Centrelink robodebt campaign to recover monies wrongly paid
to welfare recipients means the government must be serious in chasing
these constitution breachers for every cent the wrongly received or the
robodebt campaign looks like a farce.
Request: We the petitioners ask the
House to ensure that any person found to have breached the Australian
constitution must repay all monies received as salary, travel expenses,
accommodation and food allowances, office allowances and expenses. We
also would ask that pensions be cancelled and the police asked to
investigate charges of fraud for signing false declarations to nominate
for election.
A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the
House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.
Petition number:
EN0229 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:
21/05/2017
Number of signatures:
22
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Terms:
Reason: In Parliament 44 Dr. Jensen
the Chair of the Petitions Committee and Senator Cormann the Special
Minister of State hid a petition asking for an audit of compliance of
S44 of the constitution. They marked petition #1134-1604 not to be
referred. It is still on the Petitions page for Parliament 44 marked as
such in the list of petitions for Senator Cormann. In two other
petitions about S44 of the constitution Senator Cormann replied by
saying we should trust candidates to tell the truth when they nominate
for election to parliament. Senators Day and Culleton show trust and
truth doesn't work. Senator Cormanns other advice was to rely on a
voter in an electorate to have enough money to begin High Court action
in the Court of Disputed Returns should an MP be in breach of the
constitution. This excludes a huge proportion of the voting populace
from the judicial system just by address, let alone financial ability to
run a High Court case.
In Parliament 45 Mr Vasta the Chair of the Petitions Committee hid
petition EN0038 after it was presented to parliament and read into
Hansard, it was not to be referred. Action by Queensland Senators and
Mr Wallace MP got the petition referred to the SMOS.
Request: The petitioners ask that
an audit of compliance of S44 of the Australian Constitution be
conducted as soon as practicable and thought given to conducting such a
compliance audit after every election.
A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the
House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.
Petition number:
EN0230 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:
21/05/2017
Number of signatures:
7
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Terms:
Reason: In 2016 Mr Joyce signed a
nomination for election form indicating he complied with our
constitution. In 2017 the High Court of Australia determined Mr Joyce
was in fact a dual citizen of Australia and New Zealand.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to refer Mr Joyce to the Australian Federal Police and Commonwealth
Director of Public Prosecutions to determine if Mr Joyce signed a false
declarations to nominate for election and in doing so committed a
criminal act on 6 occasions. Mr Joyce is a university educated man with
high intelligence and he knew his father was a New Zealand citizen. When
signing 6 of his nomination for election forms he must have noticed the
part about our constitution and compliance with specifically S44. As a
highly educated man he would have checked to determine he complied with
our constitution most especially when he was aware of Free vs Kelly and
Sue vs Hill during his time as a businessman.
A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the
House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.
Petition number:
EN0956 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:
24/06/2019
Number of signatures:
2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Terms:
Reason: In response to petition
EN0615 The Attorney General Mr Porter said "The initiation and conduct
of a prosecution is a matter for the Commonwealth Director of Public
Prosecutions" this was in relation to a question about who was
responsible for the initiation and conduct of a prosecution for a
candidate signing a false declaration to nominate for election.
The CDPP say that is not the truth. They can not initiate nor conduct a
prosecution. EN0615 was a specific question about candidates signing
false declarations to nominate for election. The AEC say they can not
initiation prosecution or investigate candidates signing false
declarations, the AFP say it is up to the AEC to initiation prosecutions
and investigate matters and the Attorney General says it is up to the
CDPP. Now the CDPP say they can not follow the Attorney Generals
directive to initiate and conduct a prosecution of a candidate who
signed a false declaration to nominate for election.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to determine if the Attorney General is correct in saying the CDPP must
initiate prosecutions and investigate matters relating to candidates
signing false declarations to nominate for election.
If the Attorney General is incorrect then who is responsible for
initiating prosecutions and investigating matters relating to candidates
signing false declarations to nominate for election. We also ask that
once the matter is decided the relevant authority is advised it is
responsible in these matters.
A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the
House on 21/10/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.
Our creationist in chief is a proclaimed believer in the Pentecostal fairy story which tells all that the Earth is just 6000 years old. This means most of our science can't exist and our Aboriginal culture is only 6000 years old instead of the 65,000 years or more it is understood to have existed.
Because our MPs from all sides refuse to answer questions I put them into petitions in parliament. This normally means they have to be answered within 90 days. A couple I am still waiting for answer about are the ones about mobile phones, blocking the signal while in cars and an audit of S44 compliance from parliament 44.
This petition is available for signatures until 13th of November 2019. All you need is an email address and the ability to fill out a captcha test. A link to the signature page is here. The touching bit of this petition is a call for the creationist in chief to tell the world how old the world is in parliament.
Some members
of parliament freely acknowledge they are members of branches of
Christianity that believe the planet Earth is just 6000 years old. Some
have declared this publicly in filmed media events. A belief such as
this removes much that is science from their understanding of our world
and is catastrophic for Aboriginal culture reducing it to just 6000
years for the generally accepted 65,000 years.
We therefore
ask the House to have parliament, preferably the Prime Minister as
leader of the government, to declare the Earth is probably 4.5 billion
years old and Aboriginal culture is at least 65,000 years old.
Signatures are being accepted until 13 November 2019. The link is here
Terms:
Reason: Some members of parliament
freely acknowledge they are members of branches of Christianity that
believe the planet Earth is just 6000 years old. Some have declared this
publicly in filmed media events. A belief such as this removes much
that is science from their understanding of our world and is
catastrophic for Aboriginal culture reducing it to just 6000 years for
the generally accepted 65,000 years.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to have parliament, preferably the Prime Minister as leader of the
government, to declare the Earth is probably 4.5 billion years old and
Aboriginal culture is at least 65,000 years old.
The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the
Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It
was presented to the House on 25/11/2019 and has recently been referred
to the Prime Minister.
Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from
presentation in the House to respond to a petition.
Petition number:
EN1076 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:
24/09/2019
Number of signatures:
30
For those who want to buy me a coffee, thanks. Paypal me
Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.
Petition number:
EN1007 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:
5/08/2019
Terms:
Reason: In February 2019 Mr Dutton
declared he was a beneficiary of RHT family trust in his Register of
Members Interests. At the same time the ABN data base lists two
companies as being the responsibility of RHT family trust, CAMELIA
AVENUE CHILDCARE CENTRE and BALD HILLS CHILDCARE CENTRE. The Department
of Finance list both of these companies as recipients of Commonwealth
funding for many years. After the election Mr Dutton declared he had
renounced his family trust and was not a beneficiary. Mr Dutton's wife
and children are beneficiaries of the trust and the Commonwealth money
given to that trust and the two child care centres. Because his family
still benefit that is an indirect pecuniary interest in that trust and a
breach of S44 of our constitution. Voters in his electorate are
obviously terrified of upsetting a man with so much power in this
country. I was denied the chance of taking him to the Court of Disputed
Returns because I don't vote in his electorate. The house can't
determine if Mr Dutton has or hasn't breached the constitution, that is
up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven
wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to refer Mr Dutton to the High Court to ascertain if an indirect
pecuniary interest such as his family benefiting from Commonwealth
funding is a breach of our constitution. Until S44 is changed MPs must
understand nobody is above the law.
Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on
Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition
requirements. It is now available for signature online.
Signatures open: 11/09/2019 petition can be signed here
EN0963 is a petition relating to Mr Dutton signing a false declaration to
nominate for election in 2016. Also EN0955 is mentioned, that was a
petition lodged before Mr Dutton decided to renounce his family trust
and which can not be answered by a minister because it doesn't include
the updated family trust information provided by Mr Dutton on 27/6/19.
It seems an ex Queensland copper, Llew O'Brien the Chair of the Petitions Committee may be working to protect another ex Queensland copper, Dutton, from the courts. Why else would a petition about an ex Queensland copper be hidden from parliament?
A pity we must just hope posterity find it and call it out fro what it is.
Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.
Petition number:
EN0998 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:
1/08/2019
Terms:
Reason: Our Prime Minster and some
other members of the government have gone well beyond the political norm
of the past 118 years and showed their belief in a religious sect which
believes the Earth is just 6000 years old. The leader of our country
needs to be a modern intelligent person who understands the age and
depth of feeling of our Aboriginal culture. The leader of our country
needs to be one who understands science. The leader of our country
needs to be one who believes the Earth is 4.5 billion years old or more.
The country can't be run by someone who is at odds with our culture, our
science and our history.
Request: We therefore ask the House
to have the Prime Minister declare the planet Earth is at least 4.5
billion years old, that Aboriginal culture is at least 60,000 years old
and that his sect has no place in the governance of our country.
Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on
Petitions at a recent meeting. Unfortunately it is unable to be accepted
as a petition as it does not meet the petition requirements as listed
below:
Out of Order Reason: The language used in the petition is not moderate;
Your petition has therefore been rejected and signatures
will not be able to be collected. You are welcome to make changes to
your petition terms to ensure they meet the petition requirements and
submit it again.
Seems parliament is protecting our creationist from the truth. Have a read and see if you can come up with a nicer way to get the creationist to admit the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. Also gives a huge middle finger to Aboriginal culture. If you are so inclined, Paypal me
I tried again, will wait and see if they accept this - EN1049
Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.
Petition number:
EN1024 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:
16/08/2019
Terms:
Reason: Parliament is empty more
than 300 days a year. To the average voter it looks like MPs are doing
very little and are in fact work shy. Parliament in Canada sits 140-160
days a year leaving more than 200 days a year for MPs to have their
holidays and plenty time in their electorate.
Request: We therefore ask the House to match the Canadian parliament and sit for 140-160 days a year.
Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on
Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition
requirements. It is now available for signature online.
