EN1007 Dutton indirect pecuniary interest

Dear Petitioner,

Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN1007 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	5/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: In February 2019 Mr Dutton declared he was a beneficiary of RHT family trust in his Register of Members Interests. At the same time the ABN data base lists two companies as being the responsibility of RHT family trust, CAMELIA AVENUE CHILDCARE CENTRE and BALD HILLS CHILDCARE CENTRE. The Department of Finance list both of these companies as recipients of Commonwealth funding for many years. After the election Mr Dutton declared he had renounced his family trust and was not a beneficiary. Mr Dutton's wife and children are beneficiaries of the trust and the Commonwealth money given to that trust and the two child care centres. Because his family still benefit that is an indirect pecuniary interest in that trust and a breach of S44 of our constitution. Voters in his electorate are obviously terrified of upsetting a man with so much power in this country. I was denied the chance of taking him to the Court of Disputed Returns because I don't vote in his electorate. The house can't determine if Mr Dutton has or hasn't breached the constitution, that is up to the High Court. Even the Commonwealth Solicitor has been proven wrong about S44 on so many occasions.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Dutton to the High Court to ascertain if an indirect pecuniary interest such as his family benefiting from Commonwealth funding is a breach of our constitution. Until S44 is changed MPs must understand nobody is above the law.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.

Signatures open: 11/09/2019 petition can be signed here

Signatures close: 9/10/2019


Should you feel inclined or care, Paypal me

Well this is fucked.

Signatures closed and the petition wasn't referred to a minister for action.

This is the response I got from the Petition Committee explaining why.










 


Petition EN0963 is here and EN0955 here.

EN0963 is a petition relating to Mr Dutton signing a false declaration to nominate for election in 2016. Also EN0955 is mentioned, that was a petition lodged before Mr Dutton decided to renounce his family trust and which can not be answered by a minister because it doesn't include the updated family trust information provided by Mr Dutton on 27/6/19.












It seems an ex Queensland copper, Llew O'Brien the Chair of the Petitions Committee may be working to protect another ex Queensland copper, Dutton, from the courts. Why else would a petition about an ex Queensland copper be hidden from parliament?

A pity we must just hope posterity find it and call it out fro what it is.  


 



 
 

How old is the Earth EN0998 rejected

Dear Petitioner,

Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0998 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	1/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: Our Prime Minster and some other members of the government have gone well beyond the political norm of the past 118 years and showed their belief in a religious sect which believes the Earth is just 6000 years old. The leader of our country needs to be a modern intelligent person who understands the age and depth of feeling of our Aboriginal culture. The leader of our country needs to be one who understands science. The leader of our country needs to be one who believes the Earth is 4.5 billion years old or more. The country can't be run by someone who is at odds with our culture, our science and our history.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to have the Prime Minister declare the planet Earth is at least 4.5 billion years old, that Aboriginal culture is at least 60,000 years old and that his sect has no place in the governance of our country.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting. Unfortunately it is unable to be accepted as a petition as it does not meet the petition requirements as listed below:

• Out of Order Reason: The language used in the petition is not moderate;

Your petition has therefore been rejected and signatures will not be able to be collected. You are welcome to make changes to your petition terms to ensure they meet the petition requirements and submit it again.


Seems parliament is protecting our creationist from the truth.  Have a read and see if you can come up with a nicer way to get the creationist to admit the Earth is 4.5 billion years old.  Also gives a huge middle finger to Aboriginal culture.


If you are so inclined, Paypal me


I tried again, will wait and see if they accept this - EN1049

 

EN1024 Parliament to sit more during the year

Dear Petitioner,


Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN1024 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	16/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: Parliament is empty more than 300 days a year. To the average voter it looks like MPs are doing very little and are in fact work shy. Parliament in Canada sits 140-160 days a year leaving more than 200 days a year for MPs to have their holidays and plenty time in their electorate.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to match the Canadian parliament and sit for 140-160 days a year.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.


Signatures open: 11/09/2019  and can be made here

Signatures close: 9/10/2019


If you are so inclined -

Paypal me 

EN1020 Climate crisis

Dear Petitioner,


Recently you submitted a petition on the House of Representatives website with the following terms.

Petition number:	EN1020 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	9/08/2019

Terms:

• Reason: The planet Earth is pretty much finished as a home for humans and other animals unless we act dramatically to stop our polluting the biosphere. This petition is to let our descendants know some of us cared and some of us wanted change for the better. Calling a climate crisis is the first step that must be taken to ensure we have a chance to pass on a viable world for our kids and grandkids and great grandkids to live in.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to declare a climate crisis effective immediately.

Your petition was considered by the Standing Committee on Petitions at a recent meeting, and was found to meet the petition requirements. It is now available for signature online.

Signatures open: 11/09/2019 and can be signed here

Signatures close: 9/10/2019

 If you are so inclined

Paypal me




Terms:

• Reason: The planet Earth is pretty much finished as a home for humans and other animals unless we act dramatically to stop our polluting the biosphere. This petition is to let our descendants know some of us cared and some of us wanted change for the better. Calling a climate crisis is the first step that must be taken to ensure we have a chance to pass on a viable world for our kids and grandkids and great grandkids to live in.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to declare a climate crisis effective immediately.

A response from the Minister for the Environment was presented in the House on 2/12/2019 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN1020 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	9/08/2019
Number of signatures:	23.

 

Angus Taylor totally woosed out.  What a no-hoper of an environment minister.

EN0992 taxpayer funding of schools

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0992 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	29/07/2019
Number of signatures:	92

Terms:

• Reason: Australia appears to be the only country in the world that provides taxpayer funding for private schools. With religious schools it seems Scotland gives taxpayer funding to catholic schools as a result of a 1920's laws. Muslim countries give taxpayer funding to Islamic schools. There doesn't seem to be any other country in the world that has taxpayer funding for in effect private religious schools.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to stop taxpayer funding for all private and religious schools. If a person wants a private or religious school education for their children it should be paid for at their own expense, not by what is in effect government welfare for the elite.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 9/09/2019 and has recently been referred to the Minister for Education. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.



If you are so inclined  Paypal me.

EN0991 Stop charitable status for religions

Dear Petitioner,



This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0991 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	29/07/2019
Number of signatures:	227

Terms:

• Reason: The recent Royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse has shown the religious organisations in this country are only interested in protecting themselves and making money. If they were truly a charitable organisation there would have been no need for a royal Commission into the raping and abusing and in some cases torture of children.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to cancel charitable status for all religious organisations and have them start paying taxes like any other business.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 9/09/2019 and has recently been referred to the Treasurer. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.


If you are so inclined Paypal me

Why do we bother with petitions? Supposed to be trying to get MPs to take notice of what the people want. Protecting the paedophiles again.

EN0981 Richard Boyle whistleblower

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0981 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	19/07/2019
Number of signatures:	464

Terms:

• Reason: Richard Boyle is a former ATO staff member who is currently facing 161 years in jail for blowing the whistle on the ATO for its use of heavy handed tactics and revenue targets as motivation in its collection of debts. Before going public with this information he disclosed his concerns under the Public Interest Disclosure Act to the ATO where they were investigated and dismissed. He subsequently went public with this information which resulted in a investigation by Four Corners for ABC titled "Mongrel bunch of bastards". The issues he raised have since been reviewed by Treasury and the Inspector General of Taxation and resulted in changes to laws yet he is now on trial, having been charged with 66 offences, though his actions were clearly performed for the public good.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to ask the Attorney General to intervene in this matter and end the prosecution of Richard Boyle. Prosecuting this individual will greatly discourage any other potential whistle-blowers from coming forward and further erode public faith in our institutions. 

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 9/09/2019 and has recently been referred to the Attorney-General. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.  



If you feel inclined, Paypal me


Terms:

• Reason: Richard Boyle is a former ATO staff member who is currently facing 161 years in jail for blowing the whistle on the ATO for its use of heavy handed tactics and revenue targets as motivation in its collection of debts. Before going public with this information he disclosed his concerns under the Public Interest Disclosure Act to the ATO where they were investigated and dismissed. He subsequently went public with this information which resulted in a investigation by Four Corners for ABC titled "Mongrel bunch of bastards". The issues he raised have since been reviewed by Treasury and the Inspector General of Taxation and resulted in changes to laws yet he is now on trial, having been charged with 66 offences, though his actions were clearly performed for the public good.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to ask the Attorney General to intervene in this matter and end the prosecution of Richard Boyle. Prosecuting this individual will greatly discourage any other potential whistle-blowers from coming forward and further erode public faith in our institutions.

A response from the Attorney-General was presented in the House on 10/02/2020 and you can find a copy of the response here.

Petition number:	EN0981 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	19/07/2019
Number of signatures:	464

 

EN0963 Did Dutton sign false declaration n 2016

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0963 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	28/06/2019
Number of signatures:	9

Terms:

• Reason: In February 2019 Mr Dutton declared he was a beneficiary of RHT family trust in his Register of Members Interests. At the same time the ABN data base lists two companies as being the responsibility of RHT family trust, CAMELIA AVENUE CHILDCARE CENTRE and BALD HILLS CHILDCARE CENTRE. The Department of Finance list both of these companies as recipients of Commonwealth funding for many years.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to determine if Mr Dutton was a beneficiary of RHT family trust when he signed his nomination for election form for the 2016 election. As companies run by the RHT family trust are recipients of Commonwealth funding Mr Dutton may have signed a false declaration to nominate for election. We ask that the House ask the relevant authorities, either Australian Federal Police or Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions or both to prosecute criminal charges against Mr Dutton for signing a false declaration to nominate for election. 

 If you want to, please consider :-
PAYPAL ME

Another fob off, Christian Porter must be doing a Scott Morrison - thinking we are all fucking stupid.

EN0956 Did Joyce sign a false declaration to nominate?

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0956 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	24/06/2019
Number of signatures:	2

Terms:

• Reason: In 2016 Mr Joyce signed a nomination for election form indicating he complied with our constitution. In 2017 the High Court of Australia determined Mr Joyce was in fact a dual citizen of Australia and New Zealand.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to refer Mr Joyce to the Australian Federal Police and Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions to determine if Mr Joyce signed a false declarations to nominate for election and in doing so committed a criminal act on 6 occasions. Mr Joyce is a university educated man with high intelligence and he knew his father was a New Zealand citizen. When signing 6 of his nomination for election forms he must have noticed the part about our constitution and compliance with specifically S44. As a highly educated man he would have checked to determine he complied with our constitution most especially when he was aware of Free vs Kelly and Sue vs Hill during his time as a businessman. 

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 9/09/2019 and has recently been referred to the Attorney-General. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.


 If you want to, please consider :-
PAYPAL ME

En0955 Dutton or his family recieved Commonwealth funds?

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0955 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	24/06/2019
Number of signatures:	1

Terms:

• Reason: In the qualifications check list for nomination for election in 2019 Mr Dutton says he has no direct or indirect financial interests in any contract or other agreement with the Commonwealth public service.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to to determine if the family trust listed in Mr Duttons entry in the register of Members Interests dated 8/2/19 where he lists himself as a beneficiary of RHT family trust received Commonwealth funds. According to Department of Finance documents RHT family trust received more than $5 million dollars in Commonwealth funding since 2014. If the RHT family trust received Commonwealth funds and Mr Dutton or his family are beneficiaries of that trust we request the house refer the matter to the Australian Federal Police for prosecution of signing a false declaration to nominate for election and for Mr Dutton to be referred to the High Court for S44 adjudication.

PAYPAL ME

Total fob off by Christian Porter. He didn't bother reading the petition and used the Solicitor Generals advice, he is the bloke who got Barnaby Joyce so wrong.

Petition EN0954. Frydenberg false declaration

Dear Petitioner,


This is to provide you with an update on the progress of your recent petition on the following terms.

Petition number:	EN0954 (Please quote in future correspondence)
Date submitted:	24/06/2019
Number of signatures:	2

Terms:

• Reason: In the qualifications check list for nomination to stand for election Mr Frydenberg listed his mother as ceasing being an Hungarian citizen in 1948.
• Request: We therefore ask the House to determine if the Department of Immigration document N50/2/14601 signed by C.E. Norton Inspector of Customs on 16th January 1951 is a legitimate government document and shows Mr Frydenberg's mother as being an Hungarian citizen on that date. If the document is legitimate will the house refer Mr Frydenberg to the Australian Federal Police for signing a false declaration to nominate for election. Will the house also refer Mr Frydenberg to teh High Court to examine his compliance with S44 of the constitution regarding his citizenship status.

The petition was considered at a recent meeting of the Committee, and certified as meeting the requirements for petitions. It was presented to the House on 9/09/2019 and has recently been referred to the Attorney-General. Under the petition requirements, Ministers have 90 days from presentation in the House to respond to a petition.


Paypal me

Strange considering Christian Porter had already passed the matter onto the Attorney Generals Department who passed it on to the Australian Federal Police for action.

Peter Dutton asked if he was criminal or immoral

Dear Mr Dutton

in a recent video posted on social media you say you have never done anything criminal or immoral and would like to be told if you have.

Criminal

Signing a false declaration to nominate for election.

In your qualifications check list for the 2019 election you did not mention that you have an indirect pecuniary interest in companies that receive millions in Commonwealth dollars. Your wife and children get Commonwealth funding for child care centres they benefit from.  You get an indirect pecuniary interest in those child care centres because your wife and children benefit. Indirect means they money doesn't have to go directly to you or companies you own, the indirect part is your family benefits greatly.

Your failure to mention this is in breach of Division 136 & 137 of the Criminal Code

I trust you will be asking Mr Colvin to examine the case and prosecute immediately.

Immoral

You failed to put yourself to the High Court in last parliament when you were listed on the family trust and got a direct pecuniary interest in companies receiving Commonwealth dollars. Many of your parliamentary colleagues put themselves to the High Court for the court to determine if they were in parliament illegally, you didn't bother.   Mr Joyce used the same solicitors you did as did quite a few other MPs and all were found in breach of our constitution. You didn't bother which stinks of your immorality.

Immoral or illegal?

Several Commonwealth Crimes Reports have been lodged with the AFP and Mr Colvin has chosen to not even examine them.  One person who lodged a CCR was told he would be ignored.

Are Mr Colvin and the AFP refusing to examine Commonwealth Crimes Reports against members of parliament to protect you and other members of your party? It isn't just the LNP Liberals and Nationals being reported.

Or are Mr Colvin and the AFP acting under your orders to ignore the Commonwealth Crimes Reports?  Will you allow those Commonwealth Crimes Reports, last parliament and this, to be actioned by the AFP?

If you really are going to become a moral MP you should stand aside until the criminal action and the High Court actions are investigated by the courts.

I dare you to become moral and legal.

regards

Tony Magrathea

PS this letter is in parliamentary archives for posterity to determine if you are moral and legal, it will also be on social media